久久久久无码精品,四川省少妇一级毛片,老老熟妇xxxxhd,人妻无码少妇一区二区

и ԇ

l(f)rg:2017-03-30 ݋:lm

֮ǰО鿼v^|(zh)W(xu)ă(ni)ڱƪ҂M(jn)һоһµh(hun)W(xu)ǰͻW(xu)ԼŌW(xu)棬ߵă(ni)ݸӽ҂ČHJ(rn)֪h(hun)׃(dng)ȻҲ漰S~RVڂ俼^߀ҪJ(rn)(f)(x)俼쎧I(lng)Ҿwһµh(hun)W(xu) ӑ(yng)ԓΑ(yng)

һ

@һW(xu)ҪҪP(gun)עһЩrҔUԼ֪R棬_ҕҰԺ͵|(zh)W(xu)һP(gun)ע

h(hun)oL(fng)h(hun)ȫ׃

h(hun)L(fng)ˮоco(h)

h(hun)纣ןҺϫ

Ԓ}ܺČW(xu)W(xu)|(zh)W(xu)Ȯa(chn)

ڴˣܷe۱֪Rg[һЩԭ֭ԭζĈs־Scientific AmericansNational GeographicalȵeP(gun)~RϤl(f)(dng)ȻҲᵽи 漰Ԓ}ǧ׃?ni)f棬Ϥ֪RͬrҲҪλA(ch)B(yng)ٱͶ̕rӛԲ׃(yng)f׃



Ոһh(hun)W(xu)Ľ(jng)䰸

E.G.TPO17 Milankovitch Hypothesis

 ԭģ

1) Ok, so we have been talking about theories that deal with the effects of human activity on the climate. But today I’d like to talka little bit about other theories that canexplain variations in climate. And one of the best-known is called the Milankovitch Hypothesis

Q:What is the lecture mainly about?

AA hypothesis that explains how changes in Earth’s motions affect climate.

BA hypothesis that explains why the shape of earth’s orbit varies over time.

CReasons it is difficult to find evidence to support hypotheses about the climate.

DAnalyses of the accuracy of data collected in different ways.

@һεּ}҂֮ǰf^и һǰ׾F(xin)ּԿһҪǰ׾ă(ni)ıеĄ֞cֻҪץסvariations in climateͿpxAӛPӛrc(bio)“climate ׃”

2)Now, when Milankovitch first proposed this theory in the 1920s, many of his colleagues were skeptical. Milankovitch didn’t have any proof. Actually there wouldn’t be any evidence to support his hypothesis until the 1970s, when oceanographers were able to drill deep into the seafloor and collect samples, samples which were then analyzed by geologists...and this showed that earth’s climate had changed pretty much the wayMilankovitch’s hypothesis suggested it would.So this evidence was pretty strong supportfor the Milankovitch Hypothesis.And by the 1980s, most people accepted this theory.

However, in the late 1980s, some scientists were exploring Devil’sHole…Well, the Devil’ s Hole findings contradictedthe ones obtained during the 1970s, so basically the question was, were the ages of one or both the samples were wrong, or were scientists misunderstanding the significance of the evidence.

Q:What is the significance of the evidence found on the ocean floor?

AIt negated earlier evidence that Milankovitch found.

BIt led the development of new methods to measure global climate changes.

CIt helped Milankovitch first formulate his hypothesis.

DIt confirmed Milankovitch’s hypothesis.

@}P(gun)Iocean floorԭᵽpretty strong supportԑ(yng)ԓ֧ԵxDעֻҪF(xin)ͬՓһҪՓгĿģֵ֧ă(ni)ʲô

16. What did calcite deposits from Devil’s Hole reveal?

AInaccurate information about long-term climate changes.

BEvidence that contradicted Milankovitch’s hypothesis.

CEvidence that climate changes occur only locally.

DVariations in Earth’s orbit that had little impact on climate.

@}@˂ӡ҂ǰᵽmƾSf70CڴǰǛ]C(j);f80rħl(f)F(xin)ķʯӱc70sea floorаl(f)F(xin)Ęӱ_ͻ˿ԵóY(ji)Փħİl(f)F(xin)Dz֧mƾSfģxB

֪R

mƾSfJ(rn)\ӵ׃؄e@̫܉׃@Щ׃(do)̫ꖵ_(d)IJͬ@Щ̫ꖵ_(d)IJͬ(do)˵׃

c׷ۙ

h(hun) yȲ̫ҪŽc

ּǰ

һҪQм(x) ǰ׾

߉݋P(gun)ϵ

@HҪ߉݋̖~߀Ķc֮gP(gun)ϵwһ֧߀ǷвͬՓо{(dio)ijF(xin)Ҫÿ֧ʲô^c

ʾД~

@F(xin)supportcontradict

~

Փпܕ漰SӛPӛrҪ֗lcעl@ҲܼӿҴ𰸵ٶ

h(hun)W(xu) и ЌҊrٷָҲP(gun)}Ŀȥ(x)䌍ϤԒ}fЃɂ얹̈~Rm(yng)}^зe~Rͬrm(yng)@ă(ni)ԇͲôŁy

]
T]